In a stunning revelation that could change the narrative surrounding Donald Trump’s intellectual prowess, Jimmy Kimmel unveiled the former president’s 1970 Wharton School aptitude test results on his late-night show, shattering the myth of Trump’s self-proclaimed genius. The document, long shrouded in mystery and allegedly buried by Trump’s own attorney, Michael Cohen, revealed a shocking overall percentile score of just 38, placing Trump below the Ivy League threshold.
For decades, Trump has built an image of unparalleled intelligence, frequently touting his time at Wharton as proof of his intellectual superiority. He has dismissed critics as “low IQ” individuals, wielding his supposed genius as a weapon against anyone who dared to question his capabilities. However, Kimmel’s dramatic reveal exposed the truth behind the facade. The audience’s gasps and laughter as the scores were read underscored the gravity of the moment.
The test results showed Trump scoring in the 92nd percentile for verbal reasoning and the 87th percentile for math reasoning. Yet, the key score—overall cognitive aptitude—was a mere 38th percentile. This means more than 60% of test-takers outperformed him on that day. Kimmel’s commentary pointedly questioned how someone with such a low score could gain admission to one of the most prestigious business schools in the world.
Internal admission memos, also revealed during the segment, suggested that Trump’s entry into Wharton was facilitated by “deep university connections” and significant financial assurances from his father, Fred Trump. This revelation raises serious questions about the integrity of the admissions process and the role of privilege in Trump’s ascent.
The implications of this disclosure are profound. For years, Trump’s claims of being a “very stable genius” have been a cornerstone of his public persona, shaping his identity as a shrewd businessman and political strategist. Kimmel’s unveiling not only challenges that identity but also invites a broader discussion about the narratives we accept and the power of privilege in shaping perceptions of merit and success.
As the dust settles from this revelation, it is essential to reflect on the impact of such myths in American culture. The notion of the self-made genius has been a powerful narrative, but Kimmel’s segment serves as a reminder that behind the gilded exterior, the truth can often be far less flattering. The public’s response to this information will likely reverberate through the political landscape, challenging the very foundation of Trump’s self-crafted image.
